Welcome

Hi, and welcome to my real estate blog site. I hope you find the information here useful, informative, thought provoking, and perhaps good for even a chuckle or two. Please feel free to join in and participate by leaving a comment, suggestion or question. On the right side column navigation panes you will find areas for getting around on this site and some helpful links as well. To search my blog site for a topic of interest to you either use the search box in the upper left hand corner menu bar or use the blog archive on the right side column pane. Thanks for stopping by... And if you, or someone you know, is looking to buy or sell a property in Northern Virginia, please contact me or call at (703) 615-1036.

Monday, May 9, 2011

Understanding Your (FICO) Credit Report Score (Part 1)

Source:  http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/WhatsInYourScore.aspx


What’s in your FICO® score

FICO Scores are calculated from a lot of different credit data in your credit report. This data can be grouped into five categories as outlined below. The percentages in the chart reflect how important each of the categories is in determining your FICO score.

Payment history: 35%, Amounts owed: 30%, Length of credit history: 15%, New credit: 10%, Types of credit used: 10%

These percentages are based on the importance of the five categories for the general population. For particular groups - for example, people who have not been using credit long - the importance of these categories may be somewhat different.

 

Payment History

  • Account payment information on specific types of accounts (credit cards, retail accounts, installment loans, finance company accounts, mortgage, etc.)
  • Presence of adverse public records (bankruptcy, judgements, suits, liens, wage attachments, etc.), collection items, and/or delinquency (past due items)
  • Severity of delinquency (how long past due)
  • Amount past due on delinquent accounts or collection items
  • Time since (recency of) past due items (delinquency), adverse public records (if any), or collection items (if any)
  • Number of past due items on file
  • Number of accounts paid as agreed

Amounts Owed

  • Amount owing on accounts
  • Amount owing on specific types of accounts
  • Lack of a specific type of balance, in some cases
  • Number of accounts with balances
  • Proportion of credit lines used (proportion of balances to total credit limits on certain types of revolving accounts)
  • Proportion of installment loan amounts still owing (proportion of balance to original loan amount on certain types of installment loans)

Length of Credit History

  • Time since accounts opened
  • Time since accounts opened, by specific type of account
  • Time since account activity

New Credit

  • Number of recently opened accounts, and proportion of accounts that are recently opened, by type of account
  • Number of recent credit inquiries
  • Time since recent account opening(s), by type of account
  • Time since credit inquiry(s)
  • Re-establishment of positive credit history following past payment problems

Types of Credit Used

  • Number of (presence, prevalence, and recent information on) various types of accounts (credit cards, retail accounts, installment loans, mortgage, consumer finance accounts, etc.)
Please note that:
  • A FICO score takes into consideration all these categories of information, not just one or two.
    No one piece of information or factor alone will determine your score.
  • The importance of any factor depends on the overall information in your credit report.
    For some people, a given factor may be more important than for someone else with a different credit history. In addition, as the information in your credit report changes, so does the importance of any factor in determining your FICO score. Thus, it's impossible to say exactly how important any single factor is in determining your score - even the levels of importance shown here are for the general population, and will be different for different credit profiles. What's important is the mix of information, which varies from person to person, and for any one person over time.
  • Your FICO score only looks at information in your credit report.
    However, lenders look at many things when making a credit decision including your income, how long you have worked at your present job and the kind of credit you are requesting.
  • Your score considers both positive and negative information in your credit report.
    Late payments will lower your score, but establishing or re-establishing a good track record of making payments on time will raise your FICO credit score.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

"Green" Building Designs

Here are some interesting "Green Building" or eco-conscious, eco-friendly home building designs from Solaleya.










  

Monday, March 7, 2011

Floor Plans ?

Some of the best laid plans are often drawn up on napkins, pieces of scratch, or in the dirt ....

I go to the restroom for a few minutes in a restaurant, meanwhile my "Sayang" is doing this:



Thursday, December 23, 2010

Oxymoron - Don't Believe Everything You Hear

"All that glitters is not gold"

Oh really?!  But gold actually does glitter, so there is an erroneous premise here.  

To be a true and correct idiom or expression it should be coined as, "NOT all the glitters is gold" (gold glitters, but it is not all that does; such as glass, diamonds, metals, etc)  

The moral of this post?  Don't believe or just take for granted everything that you hear...

Gold Mines

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Bank of America (BoA) - "Brazen, Unauthorized & Impermissible"

Bank of America is NOT one of my respected or trusted financial institution by any means.  I feel sorry for their stockholders who got completely HOSED.

Article as reported in Fortune Magazine:



A Fistful of Someone Else's Dollars


Troubled homeowners aren't the only ones having their issues with Bank of America.

A federal bankruptcy judge ruled Tuesday that BofA (BAC) must return $500 million in collateral it seized without cause from Lehman Brothers two years ago, just after the investment bank collapsed in the biggest-ever U.S. bankruptcy.

Bank of America's actions were "brazen…unauthorized and impermissible," U.S. bankruptcy judge James Peck wrote in a ruling Tuesday, the Wall Street Journal reports.

BofA forced Lehman to post the collateral in August 2008 as questions started to mount about the investment bank's health. There's nothing unusual there, as rivals such as Citi (C) and JPMorgan Chase (JPM) did the same.  The problem lies with what BofA did in November 2008, when it took the cash from the collateral account to offset debts it was owed by Lehman. The bank did so without the court's permission, the Journal reports.

Peck ruled this week that BofA's moves violated rules protecting companies from having their assets seized, and made clear he wasn't overjoyed with the bank.
In his order, Judge Peck said it was "astonishing that [Bank of America] would make the premeditated tactical decision to deliberately seize the collateral" without first seeking court permission. The judge said Bank of America acted with "apparent disregard for the consequences" and ordered the bank to repay Lehman's bankruptcy estate the $500 million plus interest.
Tuesday's ruling came on the same day a top executive at BofA's home loans divisions said the bank regrets its missteps in the foreclosure fiasco. But the bank has no regrets in this case, a spokeswoman indicates.
We are disappointed with the court's decision, and we continue to believe that our actions were fully supported by well-established New York law and the unambiguous language of the Bankruptcy Code.  We are considering our appellate options.

Saturday, November 13, 2010

Home Valuation Code of Conduct (HVCC) Appraisals - New Rules

Just when I thought I had beat Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae's Home Valuation Code of Conduct (HVCC) appraisal guidelines into the ground, here we go again.....  (see all my previous blog entries on this topic)

Disappointed 3   Annoyed And Disappointed

The Federal Reserve proposed far reaching new rules October 18, 2010 that could affect residential real estate appraisals.  The interim rules which are to take effect December 2010, and be finalized in the Spring of 2011, prohibit outside influence in appraisers' valuations and require lenders to report evidence of appraiser misconduct to regulatory authorities.  Isn't that what HVCC was designed to do in the first place?!  So why are they "re-inventing the wheel" here on this issue?

The new rules will supersede or replace HVCC.  All of this is as a result of Congress passing the "Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act" in July 2010 and being signed into law by President Obama. The original sponsors of the bill were Barney Frank (D-MA) and Chris Dodd (D-CT) in the Senate Banking Committee as a result of lobbyists pressure to change or reform the appraisal rules or guidelines under HVCC which resulted in a whole host of problems and complaints with inaccurate appraisals produced by appraisers who were were working for low fees through appraisal management companies (AMC's), short turn around time, and unfamiliarity with the local market.

Appraisers were one of the principle parties that got us into this whole real estate market meltdown in the first place, then after rules and regulations were imposed on them to prevent collusion in appraisals, they have to go and screw things up even further for the consumer!  

As a result of this whole real estate market meltdown or bubble-burst, it is quite interesting and makes a very poignant statement to note that there were no "punitive" rules imposed on Realtors.  As buyer agents we assisted people who were able to obtain financing, which was contingent upon a satisfactory appraisal.  We had no part or undue influence in either the buyer obtaining financing or in the appraisal.  As long as they had a lender's approval letter, we assisted them in buying a home and assumed that lenders (and appraisers) were practicing prudent and rational guidelines in their lending practices.  As listing agents we had to work within the constraints of "fair market value", unrealistic seller expectations and perceptions of value; and work within the constraints or confines of the real estate appraisal - in other words, if the property didn't appraise for what a buyer was willing to offer for it, they weren't going to get the financing, and the deal was not going to go through.

Realtors cannot be blamed in this whole debacle; the finger points DIRECTLY back to lenders and appraisers who were in "cahoots" or collusion with each other in driving the price of housing literally through the roof.  Wall Street of course is also to blame since they provided the funding and means for this all to take place in the first place and knew damn well that this was going to happen.

"House of Cards" from CNBC is a great video piece of investigative journalism which documents how this all happened.

Monday, November 1, 2010

Push/Pull Door Design

This is a great concept...  but where does the lock set go ?

  Ponder


Obviously this application is for interior building structures, and not the main outdoor ingress/egress, but it's a cool design....  But I guarantee that folks would still try to pull the button out, and push the handle in !

Annoyed And Disappointed 

Friday, October 29, 2010

Say What You Mean, and Mean What You Say (Part II)

This is a follow up to my previous blog entry, part 1.

Here's another one!  Do I have grey or gray hair ??

Ponder  I Dunno

Why the contemplation or trepidation over which one to use or which one is "PC" (politically correct).  Or should I just say that my hair is an "achromatic color somewhere between black and white?!"  Maybe I should just color my hair to avoid the confusion!  LOL

Monday, October 11, 2010

National Association of Realtors - Washington, DC

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) building (on right side) in Washington, DC. The U.S. Capitol Building (Congress - House of Representatives and Senate) is visible in the background.  If they want to go lobby Congress, the only thing they have to do is just walk up the street a few blocks !  Talk about, "Location, Location, Location"  LOL  : )~

Monday, October 4, 2010

Say What You Mean, and Mean What You Say

Two of the most ambiguous words in the English language prohibit us from doing just that; the words subsequent and next. 

"Take the next exit"  -  this one ?  "No, the next"

   Disappointed 2

"Let's meet next Thursday" - next week ?  "No, this week" (then it should be let's meet this Thursday; or not this Thursday, but the next [week].

   Disappointed 3

"That's next to impossible!" -  does that mean it is almost impossible, or one degree below (or possibly even higher than) impossible?!

  Hmm 2

The word "next" can cause a great deal of confusion and can be quite vague actually! 

As a Paralegal, I have also encountered the word "subsequent" in statutes, regs, administrative law or other legal codes.  "Subsequent" can mean either before... or after; e.g. "subsequent to judgment" (also note that judgment has no e) when referring to civil procedure.  Does that mean before judgment is entered or after judgment is rendered?!   "Subsequent to receiving your travel Visa documents, you must also ..."  Does this mean before my travel Visa document is issued or after it is issued, I must do X? 

Why the ambiguity ?  Why can't we simply say before or after for the word "subsequent"; and clearly define "next" ?!

Annoyed And Disappointed